This article substantiates the necessity of scholarly development of the concept of “civil resistance capability” in the context of the full-scale and hybrid war waged against Ukraine. The relevance of the topic stems from the growing need to conceptualize the role of the civilian population in the architecture of national resistance and in ensuring the resilience of society under prolonged threats. The aim of the study is to formulate an interdisciplinary conceptual framework for this new term and to determine its semantic content, structural components, and its connections with related categories in the fields of social, behavioral, and security sciences.

To achieve the stated objective, the research applies methods of conceptual analysis, systematization, comparative-terminological review, elements of structural-functional modeling, and interdisciplinary synthesis. Particular attention is paid to the phenomenological exploration of psychological, sociocultural, axiological, and behavioral determinants of the civilian population’s resistance capacity.

The study proposes an original definition of “civil resistance capability” as an integrative quality of individuals and communities, manifested in the ability to offer conscious, motivated, and morally grounded resistance to an aggressor by mobilizing value-based, cognitive, volitional, communicative, and socio-organizational resources. Six basic structural components of the phenomenon are outlined: value-motivational, cognitive, emotional-volitional, social, communicative, and behavioral. An adaptive-mobilizational model of their interaction is proposed. The concept is distinguished from related terms such as psychological resilience, mobilizational readiness, self-organization, and resistance by examining its semantic capacity and functional designation.

The practical value of the results lies in the applicability of the proposed conceptualization to the development of legal frameworks, educational programs, psychodiagnostic tools, and strategic documents aimed at enhancing societal resilience and organizing national resistance effectively. The study’s conclusions identify prospects for future empirical investigations focused on the operationalization of the construct, adaptation of measurement methodologies, and integration of resistance capability into broader security policies.

Key words: civil resistance capability, psychology of resistance, resilience, social mobilization, national security, behavioral responses, value orientation, identity, interdisciplinary approach.

References

1. Assmann, J. (2011), Cultural memory and Early civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978 0511996306.
2. Bandura, A. (2001), “Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52. No. 1, pp. 1–26, available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
3. Bar-Tal, D. (2013), Intractable Conflicts: Socio-Psychological Foundations and Dynamics, Cambridge University Press,
4. Bennet, G. (2024), “In Ukraine I found the definition of resilience”, The Times, February 28, available at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ gabriella-bennet-column-in-ukraine-daily-acts-of-kindness-resist-every-bomb-jkkpg7vn0.
5. Bertalanffyvon, L. (1968), General system theory: Foundations, development, applications, George Braziller, New York.
6. Bodas, M., Peleg, K., Stolero, N. & Adini, B. (2022), “Understanding societal resilience– Cross-sectional study in eight countries”, Frontiers in Public Health,  10, Art. 883281, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883281.
7. Bonanno, G. (2004), “Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?”, American Psychologist, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 20–28, available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20.
8. Bouchat, P. & Rimé, B. (2018), “National identity and collective memory: A social psychological perspective”, in M. Dinnie (Ed.), Bridging disciplinary perspectives of country image reputation, brand, and identity, Routledge, 89–103.
9. Clark, J. (2024), “Resilience as a “concept at work” in the war in Ukraine: Exploring its international and domestic significance”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 720–740, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210524000305.
10. Center for Civilians in Conflict (2023), The Role of Civil-Military Cooperation in Protection of Civilians: The Ukraine Experience, available at: https://civiliansinconflict.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023 /10/The-Role-of-Civil-Military-Cooperation-in-Protection-of-Civilians-The-Ukraine-Experience.pdf.
11. Deiaco, H. (2024), Rethinking Civil-Military Collaboration: ARelational Practice Approach to Total Defense in Sweden : Doctoral dissertation, Försvarshögskolan (FHS).
12. Durkheim, E. (1982), The rules of sociological method, Lukes (Ed.), W. D. Halls (Trans.), Free Press, New York, original work published 1895.
13. Frankl, V. (2020), Man’s search for meaning, Beacon Press, Boston, original work published 1946.
14. Heath-Kelly, C. (2025), “Social defence” and the resilience of the domestic war on terror: A genealogy of social security, national security, and defence”, European Journal of International Security, 10, No. 1, pp. 9–26, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2024.33.
15. Huddy, L. & Khatib, N. (2007), “American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement”, American Journal of Political Science,51, No. 1, pp. 63–77, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15405907.2007. 00237.x.
16. Kimhi, S., Eshel, Y., Marciano, H. & Adini, B. (2023), “Impact of the war in Ukraine on resilience, protective, and vulnerability factors”, Frontiers in Public Health, 11, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpubh.2023.1053940.
17. Kushnir, M., Nagurney, A. & Konrad, R. (2024), “Civilian-military integration in Ukrainian defense supply chain”, Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference, available at: https://doi.org/10.59 297/827zde93.
18. Masten, A. & Narayan, A. J. (2012), “Child development in the context of disaster, war, and terrorism: Pathways of risk and resilience”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 227–257, available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100356.
19. Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (2016), Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change, 2nd ed., Guilford Press, New York.
20. Myadar, O. & Dempsey, K. (2021), Making and unmaking refugees: Geopolitics of social ordering and struggle within the global refugee regime, Geopolitics, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 367–374, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1924552.
21. Parsons, T. (1951), The social system, Routledge, London.
22. PAX for Peace (2025), Protection of Civilians Ukraine Briefings, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2025/05 /2503-UKR3-Resistance.pdf.
23. Plokhy, S. (2024), The history of Ukraine: The land and its people, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Touchstone Books/ Simon & Schuster, New York, available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990.
25. Ricoeur, P. (2004), Memory, history, forgetting, Blamey & D. Pellauer (Trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Quamruzzaman, A. (2015), “Rituals of violence in armed movements: Evidence from Bangladesh”, McGill Sociological Review,5, pp. 43–56, available at: https://mcsr.mcgill.ca/article/view/3.
27. Schwartz, S. (2011), “Studying Values: Personal Adventure, Future Directions”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 307–319, original work published 2011, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396925.
28. Staub, E. (2013), The roots of goodness and resistance to evil: Inclusive caring, moral courage, altruism born of suffering, active bystandership, and heroism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Tomaney, J. (2013), “Parochialism – a defence”, Progress in Human Geography, 37, No. 5, pp. 658–672, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512471235.
30. Wagnsson, C., Sperling, J. & Hallenberg, J. (Eds.) (2009), European security governance: the European Union in a Westphalian world, Routledge, available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875971.
31. Yang, N. & Zhang, R. (2023), “Under threat: Emotional and behavioral responses to occupational identity threat”, Journal of Management & Organization, 29, No. 3, pp. 464–480, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.53.

32. Yurchuk, S. & Lyashch, Y. (2024), “The relationship between emotional intelligence and stress resistance of the individual”, Personality and Environmental Issues, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 44–49, available at: https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-6033-2024-3(1)-44-49